Follow us on

Our blog

Feb 02, 2025

Journal Watch: The Future of Carpal Tunnel Release: Long-Term Success with Ultrasound Guidance

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) affects millions of people worldwide, causing pain, numbness, and weakness in the hands. For many, surgery was the only option when conservative treatments fail. Traditionally, open and endoscopic surgical techniques have been the standard, but a newer, minimally invasive approach using ultrasound guidance is proving to be a game-changer.

A recent study by Cano et al. provides compelling evidence for the long-term success of ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release (CTR-US), with patients experiencing significant and lasting symptom relief (Cano et al., 2024).

What Is Ultrasound-Guided Carpal Tunnel Release?

CTR-US is a minimally invasive procedure that uses real-time ultrasound imaging to guide the release of the transverse carpal ligament. This technique allows for precise visualization of critical structures, reducing the risk of nerve or vascular injury. Unlike traditional methods that require a larger incision, CTR-US involves a small incision, often less than 5 mm, leading to less post-operative pain, faster recovery, and lower complication rates (Rojo-Manaute et al., 2016).

Key Findings from the Study

The study conducted by Cano et al. followed 102 patients (162 hands) who underwent CTR-US, with a follow-up period ranging from two to six years (Cano et al., 2024). The findings highlight the long-term effectiveness and safety of this procedure:

Table from Cano et al. (2024) article showing high satisfaction with the carpal tunnel release using ultrasound guidance with Sonex.
  • High Patient Satisfaction: At final follow-up, 91.2% of patients reported being satisfied with the procedure (Cano et al., 2024).
  • Significant Symptom Improvement: Patients showed lasting reductions in pain and functional limitations, as measured by the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores (Levine et al., 1993).
  • Minimal Need for Additional Surgeries: No revision surgeries were required, indicating the durability of CTR-US results (Wang et al., 2019).
  • Comparable Outcomes for Bilateral Procedures: Patients who had both hands treated simultaneously had similar outcomes to those who underwent unilateral procedures (Nakamichi & Tachibana, 1997).

The Future of Carpal Tunnel Surgery

The results of this study reinforce the growing evidence that CTR-US is not only a safe and effective option but also a superior alternative for many patients with CTS. As more surgeons adopt this technique, it has the potential to become the new standard of care for carpal tunnel release. If you're considering carpal tunnel surgery, discussing ultrasound-guided options with your healthcare provider may be the key to a quicker recovery and lasting relief. According to Cano et al. (2024), 91.2% of patients reported satisfaction with CTR-US, and none required revision surgeries over a follow-up period of two to six years, indicating its long-term effectiveness.

Why Choose Ultrasound-Guided Carpal Tunnel Release?

Open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) involves a larger incision and a longer recovery period, while endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) uses a smaller incision but still requires specialized equipment and carries a risk of incomplete ligament release. In contrast, CTR-US provides real-time imaging for precise ligament transection, reducing complications and accelerating recovery.

CTR-US offers several advantages over traditional open and endoscopic
methods:

  • Smaller Incision, Less Scarring: With an incision typically under 5 mm, scarring is minimal compared to open surgery (Fowler et al., 2022).
  • Faster Recovery Time: Many patients return to normal activities within days rather than weeks (Eberlin et al., 2023).
  • Lower Risk of Complications: The precision of ultrasound guidance reduces the likelihood of nerve damage or incomplete ligament release (Shah et al., 2022).
  • Effective for Long-Term Relief: As shown in the study, patients continue to experience significant improvements in symptoms even years after the procedure (Cano et al., 2024).

Final Thoughts

Ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release is revolutionizing the treatment of CTS by offering a minimally invasive, highly effective alternative to traditional surgical methods. With strong long-term results, high patient satisfaction, and reduced recovery times, CTR-US is paving the way for the future of hand surgery.

Are you or a loved one struggling with carpal tunnel syndrome? Talk to your doctor about ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release and see if it’s the right option for you!

Graft showing significant improvement in carpal tunnel symptoms at 1 month after the procedure, and maintained improvement over 3.5 years out from the procedure.

References

  • Cano LC, Leiby BM, Shum LC, Ward MG, Joseph AE. (2024). Clinical results of carpal tunnel release using ultrasound guidance in over 100 patients at two to six years. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online, 6(2024), 349e354.
  • Rojo-Manaute JM, Capa-Grasa A, Chana-Rodriguez F, et al. (2016). Ultra-minimally invasive ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release: A randomized clinical trial. J Ultrasound Med, 35(6), 1149-1157.
  • Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, et al. (1993). A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 75(11), 1585-1592.
  • Wang PH, Wu PT, Jou IM. (2019). Ultrasound-guided percutaneous carpal tunnel release: 2-year follow-up of 641 hands. J Hand Surg Eur Vol, 46(3), 305-307.
  • Nakamichi K, Tachibana S. (1997). Ultrasonographically assisted carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg, 22(5), 853-862.
  • Fowler JR, Chung KC, Miller LE. (2022). Multicenter pragmatic study of carpal tunnel release with ultrasound guidance. Expert Rev Med Devices, 19(3), 273-280.
  • Eberlin KR, Amis BP, Berkbigler TP, et al. (2023). Multicenter randomized trial of carpal tunnel release with ultrasound guidance versus mini-open technique. Expert Rev Med Devices, 20(7), 597-605.
  • Shah SA, Khan F, Ejaz H, Kanth RR, Ahmed W, Qureshi Z. (2022). Comparison of minimally invasive carpal tunnel release with open carpal tunnel release. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 16(11), 433.

Are you or a loved one struggling with carpal tunnel syndrome? Talk to your doctor about ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release and see if it’s the right option for you!


(781) 591-7855

info@BSBortho.com

20 Walnut St

Suite 14

Wellesley MA 02481

More Articles

Feb 02, 2025

Carpal Tunnel Release with Ultrasound Guidance (using Sonex): Expected Outcomes with Dr. Latzka

Join Dr. Latzka as he discusses the benefits and expected outcomes of ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release (USGCTR) using the Sonex device. In this video, you'll learn about how this minimally invasive procedure

Read More